'Brand'ishing the Turds

Presenting some Shiity news hitting the tabloids about the 'Pari' Katy Perry and Sex ka Addict -' Russel Brand.'.

Since the papers lack to create gumption - let me break down some of the basic news 2 the people reading it :)

Apparently, Kate and Russell "have become devout worshippers of Lord Ganesha" just like how the couples are fans of substance abuse. (no offence to the deity. )

Just like how Heidi Klum and Seal got re-married in a Hindi Wedding ceremony, and while the rituals were being performed by a sundry pandit.. Hiedi had tears in her eyes as she understood the reasons why a hindu woman leaves her 'sabkuch and becomes parayi' to her parents.

Anybody find it funny, eh?

Just like how, soon enough. Heidi was dressed as Maa Kali for  Halloween party at her place, ( not surprisingly, she bagged the award for the best costume of the night !)

Just like Julia Roberts got converted to Hinduism after shooting in India for ehr 'sleepy' movie 'Eat.Pray,Love'

Digressing from the point to the point of focus, Russell Brand gifted Katy Perry a tigress as a sign of remembrance and un-ending love . why? For reasons the tigress in question alone knows. and oh. So that the so called activists in question do not get their share of lime-light.  the tigress claimed she will be left back in India while he would provide some the dollars for her welfare. the tigress resents that she dint get a chance to share a bed or a bathtub with Katy . Katy who has previously shared her bed with a girl, Travie McCoy, Russel Brand to name a few.

Save the straying look after the wedding Katy. 

Has your love for Katy too gone out of the window as soon as you left India ???? Eh, Russel ??

And in the meanwhile, Rihanna who was supposed to be her so called bridsmaid could make it for the wedding because of her professional commitments.

'All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players'


Couldn't sum it any better. 

Love, Actually

Love ( or the HC ) will soon get them down

                Agony aunts like me have another issues to deal with lately, other than the usual set of relationship hassles that their friends go through. With HC thinking of ruling that a woman in a live-in relationship with a man will receive ‘palimony’ irrespective of whether the relationship turned a night on a bed of roses or a gateway of thorns.

               Personally to me, the HC raising this issue is quite baffling. Apart from deflecting from the many issues it has on its list many as old as timeless as the Babri-Ayodya issue, this idea is something even female activists wouldn’t have come up with!

              To be living in a day where chivalry can be counted as a pot of luck, the petition to pay palimony is a little too blatant to exist in this coeval, it is disparaging for men. Sure this resonates in every guys mind like a drum. As for some girls, the gold diggers get a new source of livelihood. I say , more problems to the cads and cadets in love!

                    Moreover, girls are no more the ‘weaker sex’. Chivalrous men are definitely a yes. Gallantry too. But owning up cash to a woman because it dint work out Well, let’s just put it this way. She is way too self-respecting, independent and self loving whore to accept money when she has enough money to feed a family of 5. Financial security is no more a reason to fall in love with the alpha female.

                    Besides, what’s love got 2 do with materialistic pleasures???

                      Soon cupidity will replace cupids. Love arrows will be exchanged f or locked horns. Live- ins  are a good choice for couples who want to give their relationship a good try, let's not lay its paws on love and clench the few good men!

                      Let’s not rain and ruin Love’s parade. Love doesn’t need more notoriety than it has already earned.